The conjunction commutativity law does not hold in natural language: Difficulties in the search for syntactic support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2021.24.2.22Keywords:
conjunction, pragmatics, semantics, syntaxAbstract
Orenes and Johnson-Laird gave arguments to show that the conjunction commutativity law, that is, the principle providing that the order of the conjuncts has no influence on a coordinating conjunction such as ‘and’, is not respected by natural language. Their point was that both semantics and pragmatics are more important than syntax, and that, for that reason, semantic and pragmatic factors can change the sense of a sentence with ‘and’ if the order of its conjuncts is reversed. This paper keeps following this direction and tries to argue that it is really hard to find syntactic characteristics in sentences that can explain changes such as those ones.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
- Braine, M. D. S. & O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.) (1998) Mental Logic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
- Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2019) Deontics: Meaning, reasoning, and emotion. Materiali per una Storia della Cultura Guiridica, XLIX(1), 89-112.
- Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
- Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.) (2007) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Henlé, M. (1962) On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366-378.
- Hornstein, N. (1987) Logic as Grammar: An Approach to Meaning in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
- Hornstein, N. (1990) As the Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010) Against logical form. Psychologica Belgica, 50(3/4), 193-221. Khemlani, S., Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2018) Facts and possibilities: A model-based theory of sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1887-1924.
- Khemlani, S., Hinterecker, T., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2017) The provenance of modal inference. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 259-264). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- López-Astorga, M. (2015) The disjunction introduction rule: Syntactic and semantic considerations. Pragmalingüística, 23, 141-149.
- López-Astorga, M. (2018) The problem of the order of the conjuncts in the coordinating conjunction ‘and’: A logical-syntactic solution. Aufklärung, 5(3), 11-20.
- Orenes, I. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012) Logic, models, and paradoxical inferences. Mind & Language, 27(4), 357-377.
- Rips, L. J. (1994) The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
Downloads
Published
2023-04-19
Issue
Section
Articles
