Management Decision-Making as a Mechanism for Reducing the Level of Global Risk and Its Redistribution

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5782/.kjhss.2023.107.118

Keywords:

internal risk management, risk prevention, effective decision-making, ways to reduce risk, negative impact of risks

Abstract

Modern conditions of turbulence in the external economic environment require business structures not only to respond quickly to new challenges, but also to form scenario models of behaviour in order to maintain competitive market advantages based on an objective review of their own commercial potential and reserves. It is noteworthy that the internal risks of the business structure are the primary obstacle in the growth of the efficiency of the commercial structure and determine its level of profitability. The purpose of the research is to assess the factor of formation of biased management decisions and the features of their implementation as factors of reducing the manifestation of internal business risks. Indicated that the system of effective business management must always take into account the manifestation and pressure of internal risk due to a number of factors that cannot be accurately assessed. Modern methodology of project management and project management does not take into account the tool of biased decisions. Anti-crisis management is presented as a mandatory element of management knowledge. Therefore, the further development of management should focus on the adoption of biased management decisions and the development of mechanisms for their timely implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Alshiqi, S., & Sahiti, A. (2021). Risk management and profitability of commercial banks of Western Balkans countries of Kosovo, Albania, North Macedonia, and Serbia . Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i1.633
  • Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation, European Journal of Operational Research,Volume 253, Issue 1,2016,Pages 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.
  • Cheol J., et. al. (2020). Building a coordination system of HRD, research and industry for knowledge and technology-driven economic development in South Asia, International Journal of Educational Development,Volume 74, 102161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102161.
  • Falkner, E.M. and Hiebl, M.R.W. (2015), "Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence", Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079
  • Guo Ie H, et. al. (2022). Evaluation of risk adjustment performance of diagnosis-based and medication-based comorbidity indices in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270468. PMID: 35802678; PMCID: PMC9269939.
  • Howlett, M., C., Leongb, Kuan, L., Sahu, S. (2022). Managing internal policy risk: Australia, the UK and the US compared. Policy Design and Practice,5, 2, 152-163. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25741292.2022.2065716. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2065716
  • Hsieh, CJ., Fifić, M. & Yang, CT. (2020). A new measure of group decision-making efficiency. Cogn. Research 5, 45 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00244-3
  • Khaw, T.Y. and Teoh, A.P. (2022), "Risk management in higher education research: a systematic literature review", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2022-0097
  • Klučka J. and Grünbichler R. (2020). Enterprise Risk Management–Approaches Determining Its Application and Relation to Business Performance. Quality Innovation Prosperity 24, 2 (2020), 51–58.
  • Li M, Mai Z, Yang J, Zhang B, Ma N. Ideal Time of Day for Risky Decision Making: Evidence from the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Nat Sci Sleep. 2020 Jul 16;12:477-486. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S260321. PMID: 32765144; PMCID: PMC7381795.
  • Li, X. (2017). Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 167–181. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-015-1923-4
  • Liu, Y. (2020). Research on the impact of sharing economy development on accounting in the BD era, Journal of Jiamusi Education College, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 46-47
  • Mayernik, M.S., Breseman, K., Downs, R.R., Duerr, R., Garretson, A., Hou, C.-Y. (Sophie) . and (EDGI) and Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP) Data Stewardship Committee, E.D.G.I., Risk Assessment for Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 19(1), p.10. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-010
  • Paldam, M. (2021). "Methods Used in Economic Research: An Empirical Study of Trends and Levels" Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, 2021, pp. 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2021-0003
  • Pascarella G., et. al. Risk Analysis in Healthcare Organizations: Methodological Framework and Critical Variables. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 8;14:2897-2911. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S309098. PMID: 34267567; PMCID: PMC8275831.
  • Santos, A. L. T. dos, & Reis, A. da C. (2021). Theoretical Trends in Risk Management in Sustainable Public Procurement: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Scopus and Web of Science Databases. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental - RGSA, 15, e02733. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v15i2.2733
  • Seo, J. et. al. (2018). An analysis of economic impact on IoT industry under GDPR, Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2018, Article ID 6792028, 2018.
  • Simkovich, S.M., Thompson, L.M., Clark, M.L. et al. (2021). A risk assessment tool for resumption of research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic for field trials in low resource settings. BMC Med Res Methodol 21, 68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01232-x
  • Sutton, R., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D., Sadowski, D., Fedorak, R. & Kroeker, K., (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.npj Digital Medicine, 3, 17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-0221-y
  • Taylor, C. et al. (2019). Environmental Regulation in Transition: Policy Officials' Views of Regulatory Instruments and Their Mapping to Environmental Risks. Science of The Total Environment, 646, 1 January 2019, 811-820. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969718327086?via%3Dihub. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.217

Downloads

Published

2023-03-28