The Relationship between Learner Autonomy and Language Learning Strategies among English for Medical Purposes (EMP) Students in Turkey

Authors

  • Hatice Kubra Chetin Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey
  • Enisa Mede Bahcheshehir University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2022.25.3.38

Keywords:

ESP, EMP, learner autonomy, language learning strategies

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out the level of learner autonomy, the use of language learning strategies and examine the relationship between them in the English for Medical Purposes (EMP) program in Turkey. The study also aimed to shed light on EMP learners’ and their instructors’ perceptions regarding ESP instruction. In this mixed-method study, the data were collected from two questionnaires applied to gather information on the level of learner autonomy, and the frequency of the use of learning strategies; a placement test administered at the very beginning of the semester, and semi-structured interviews conducted with the participating learners and their instructors. The findings revealed that the students were moderately autonomous. Social and metacognitive learning strategies were most frequently used by the participants. Additionally, there was a varied relationship between learner autonomy and the use of learning strategies. However, no significant correlation was found in their proficiency level. Finally, both EMP students and their instructors shared positive perceptions of ESP instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Abadi, E. A. M., & Baradaran, A. (2013). The relationship between learner autonomy and vocabulary learning strategies in Iranian EFL learners with different language proficiency level. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(3), 176-185.
  • Antic, Z. (2007). Forward in teaching English for medical purposes. Medicine and biology, 14(3), 141-147.
  • Azumi, K. (2008). An experimental study of language learning strategies: Particular focus on the patterns of strategy use by Japanese university learners of English. 岩手大学大学院人文社会科学研究科研究紀17, 149-169.
  • Bárbara, N. (2007). Autonomy in ESP: Solution or Recipe? In Gálová, D. (Ed) Languages for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions. (pp. 18-31) London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Belcher, D.D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133-156.
  • Belcher, D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for Specific Purposes in Theory and Practice, (pp. 1-20). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Benson, P. (2011). What’s new in autonomy. The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15-18.
  • Benson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839-843.
  • Boniadi, A., Ghojazadeh, M., & Rahmatvand, N. (2013). Problems of English for Specific Purpose course for medical students in Iran. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 48-55.
  • Cakici, D. (2017). An investigation of learner autonomy in Turkish EFL Context. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 89-99.
  • Ceylan, N. O. (2017) The Relationship between Learner Autonomy and Language Learning Strategies. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 114-125.
  • Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518.
  • Chen, H. I., & Pan, H. H. (2015). Learner autonomy and the use of language learning strategies in a Taiwanese junior high school. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(1), 52-64.
  • Coffey, B. (1984). ESP–English for specific purposes. Language Teaching, 17(1), 2-16.
  • Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109-117.
  • Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24(4), 24-34.
  • Dişlen, G. (2011). Exploration of how students perceive autonomous learning in an EFL context. (pp. 126-136). Gaziantep: Zirve University.
  • Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). An overview of ESP in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (1994). Comments on Rod Ellis's "The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition". Implicit/Explicit Knowledge and Language Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 166-172.
  • Hardan, A.A. (2013). Language learning strategies: a general overview. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 106, 1712-1726.
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206.
  • Lai, Y.C. (2009). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 255-280.
  • Lee, K. R., & Oxford, R. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and strategy awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 7-32.
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentic.
  • Little, D. (2003). Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. Guide to Good Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259874624_Learner_autonomy_and_secondforeign_language_learning
  • Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
  • Myartawan, I.P.N.W., Latief, M.A., & Suharmanto, S. (2013). The correlation between learner autonomy and English proficiency of Indonesian EFL college learners. Teflin Journal, 24(1), 63-81.
  • Naiman, N. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Research in Education Series No. 7. Multilingual Matters.
  • Negari, G.M., & Solaymani, M. (2013). The relationship among autonomy, thinking styles and language learning strategy use in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 332.
  • Nisbet, D.L., Tindall, E.R., & Arroyo, A.A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign language annals, 38(1), 100-107.
  • O'Malley, J.M., O'Malley, M.J., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. Cengage Learning, Inc, Florence, United States.
  • Oxford, R.L. (1999). Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38(1), 109-126.
  • Park, G.P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign language annals, 30(2), 211-221.
  • Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24-31.
  • Razali, N.M., & Wah, Y.B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modelling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
  • Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 35(5), 40.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the "good language learner" can teach us? TESOL Quarterly, 41-51.
    Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Origin and development of English for Medical Purposes. Part I: Research on written medical discourse. Medical Writing, 23(1), 49-51.
  • Samaie, M., Khany, R., & Habibi, N. (2015). On the relationship between learner autonomy and language learning strategies among Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 6(2), 96-109.
  • Sönmez, G. (2016). How Ready are your Students for Autonomous Language Learning? Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching (TOJELT), 1(3), 126-134.
  • Stoynoff, S. (1993). Oxford's Language learning strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know (Rebecca Oxford). Bilingual Research Journal, 17(1-2), 117-121.
  • Strevens, P. (1977). Special-purpose language learning: A perspective. Language Teaching, 10(3), 145-163.
  • Tsao, C., Wei, A., & Fang, A. (2008). ESP for college students in Taiwan: A survey of student and faculty perceptions. In: 2008 International Symposium on ESP & Its Application in Nursing & Medical English Education. p. 245-262.
  • Uztosun, M.S. (2014). The impact of language learning experience on language learner strategy use in Turkish EFL context. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(1), 157-168.
  • Yang, N.D. (1998). Exploring a new role for teachers: Promoting learner autonomy. System, 26(1), 127-135.
  • Yang, Y., & Cornelius, L. F. (2004). Students' perceptions towards the quality of online education: A qualitative approach. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Yıldırım, Ö. (2008). Turkish EFL learners’ readiness for learner autonomy. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 65-80.
  • Yumuk, A. (2002). Letting go of control to the learners: the role of the Internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. Educational Research, 44(2), 141-156.
  • Yılmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: a study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682-687.
  • Zhang, L.X. & Li X.X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15-23.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-25

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 3 (2022): Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.