Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Azerbaijani Students and its Relation to their Academic and Technical English Vocabulary Knowledge

Authors

  • Konul Hajiyeva Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan
  • Bahman Amani Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan
  • Milana Abbasova Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2022.25.2.60

Keywords:

Vocabulary, Learning Strategies, Academic Vocabulary, Technical Vocabulary

Abstract

With English turning into a global language among the people in all parts of the world, it has played a similarly essential role in the educational system of Azerbaijan. Vocabulary is a vital and inseparable part of the four language skills in the activity of language learning. This research was aimed at investigating the use of various vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) among Azerbaijani engineering students. Moreover, the overall frequency of strategy use was explored by Azerbaijani learners as high strategy users, medium strategy users, and low strategy users. The study also investigated the students’ academic and technical English vocabulary knowledge, finding that the vocabulary learning strategy use is done in relation to students’ academic and technical English vocabulary knowledge. The descriptive-quantitative research design was employed in this study. Two kinds of research instruments were utilized. A 60-item academic and a 30-item technical vocabulary test and an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies with 23-item were employed. The findings demonstrated that there is not a significant relationship between VLSs and academic and technical English vocabulary knowledge of Azerbaijani engineering students. The research also indicated that meta-cognitive strategies included the most and least frequently used strategies among Azerbaijani learners. Consequently, Azerbaijani engineering students were high strategy users. It is obvious that vocabulary should not be treated as an additional material; on the contrary, syllabus designers and instructors have to put it forward as a vital ability in second or foreign language learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afshar, H.S., Moazam, I., & Arbabi, H.R. (2014) "Engineering and Humanities Students" Strategies for Vocabulary Acquisition: An Iranian Experience", Linguistik Online, 65 (3), pp. 45-63.
  2. Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011) "The Type of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by ESL Students in University Putra Malaysia", English Language Teaching, 4 (2), pp. 84-90.
  3. Askar, W.A. (2016) "A Survey on the Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies by ELT and ELL Students of Duhok University in Kurdistan", The 2016 International Academic Research Conference in Milan, pp. 413-426.
  4. Bai, Zh. (2018) "An Analysis of English Vocabulary Learning Strategies", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (4), pp. 853-859.
  5. Baskin, S., İşcan, A., Karagoz, B., & Birol, B. (2017) "The Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Teaching Turkish as a Second Language", Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (9), pp. 126-134.
  6. Boonkongsaen, N. (2012) "Factors Affecting Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Synthesized Study", Naresuan University Journal, 20 (2), pp. 45-53.
  7. Brieger, N., & Pohl, A. (2002) Technical English: Vocabulary and Grammar. Oxford: Summertown Publishing.
  8. Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.) Core. In dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved September 15, 2020, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/core
  9. Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.) Subsequent. In dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved September 15, 2020, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/subsequent
  10. Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.) Sufficient. In dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved September 15, 2020, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sufficient
  11. Çelik, S., & Toptaş, V. (2010) "Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use of Turkish EFL Learners", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 3, pp. 62–71.
  12. Chung, T.M., & Nation, P. (2003) "Technical Vocabulary in Specialized Texts", Reading in a Foreign Language, 15 (2), pp. 103-116.
  13. Chung, T.M., & Nation, P. (2004) "Identifying Technical Vocabulary", System, 32 (2), pp. 251-263.
  14. Coxhead, A. (2000) "A New Academic Word List", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp. 213-238. DOI: 10.2307/3587951
  15. Coxhead, A., & Hirsch, D. (2007) "A Pilot Science-specific Word List", Revue française de linguistique appliquée 8, pp. 65-78.
  16. Cunningham, S. (2011) "The Identification of Technical Vocabulary in Texts", Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review. Vol. 16, pp. 137-146.
  17. Dóczi, B. (2011) "Comparing the Vocabulary Learning Strategies of High School and University Students: A Pilot Study", WoPaLP, Vol. 5, pp. 138-158.
  18. Farjami, F., & Aidinlou, N. A. (2013) "Analysis of the Impediments to English Vocabulary Learning and Teaching", International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1 (4-1), pp. 1-5. Doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.20130101.11
  19. Hajiyeva, K. (2014) "Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Level Needs: An Empirical Study of Azerbaijani English Majors", International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 9 (1), pp. 51-65.
  20. Hajiyeva, K. (2015a) "A Corpus-based Lexical Analysis of Subject-specific University Textbooks for English Majors", Ampersand 2, pp. 136–144.
  21. Hajiyeva, K. (2015b) "Exploring the Relationship between Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes and Their Increased Use by Azerbaijani English Majors", English Language Teaching, 8 (8), pp. 31-45.
  22. Heng, K. (2011) Effective Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Perspectives from Cambodian Students and Teachers. Unpublished Master"s Thesis.
  23. Hui, D. (2004) "Reflections on the Vocabulary Size of Chinese University Students", International Education Journal, 5 (4), pp. 571-581.
  24. Karimova, V. (2017) "Multilingualism in Azerbaijan: The most Preferred Foreign Languages in Private Universities of the Country and its Socioeconomic Aspects", American Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 1 (4), pp. 64-69. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajeit.20170104.13
  25. Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2018) "Measuring the Contribution of Academic and General Vocabulary Knowledge to Learners" Academic Achievement", Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31, pp. 44-57.
  26. Mihalache, R. (2010) Teaching Technical Vocabulary to the 1st Year Students of Food Processing. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, 53 (1), Seria Agronomie, pp. 384-387.
  27. Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997) Vocabulary Size, Text Coverage and Word Lists, In N.
    Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy (6-17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Nizonkiza, D., & Dyk, T. (2015) "Academic Literacy of South African Higher Education Level Students: Does Vocabulary Size Matters", Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 44, pp. 147-174.
  29. Pecorari, D., Shaw P., & Malmström, H. (2019) "Developing a New Academic Vocabulary Test", Journal of English for Academic Purposes 39, pp. 1-13.
  30. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1993) "Identifying and Assessing Vocabulary Learning Strategies", Tai TESOL Bulletin, 5 (4), pp. 22-33.
  31. Shabani, M. B., & Tazik, K. (2014) "Coxhead"s AWL across ESP and Asian EFL Journal Research Articles (RAs): A Corpus-Based Lexical Study", Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, pp. 1722-1728.
  32. Sudarman, S., & Chinokul, S. (2018) "The English Vocabulary Size and Level of English Department Students at Kutai Kartanegara University", ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning and Research Journal), 4 (1), pp. 1-15.
  33. Suryati, N., & Fadilah, A. F. (2019) "English Vocabulary Knowledge of EFL Engineering Students", World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education (WIETE), 17 (1), pp. 66-70.
  34. Xue, G., & Nation, P. (1984) "A University Word List", Language Learning and Communication 3, pp. 215–229.
  35. Zhu, J. (2017) The Technical Vocabulary of Newspapers. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4872. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4872

Downloads

Published

2023-02-12